Skip to content

Extreme Parental Alienation Should Be Considered Child Abuse And Referred Criminally

On this page
"While MSPCC was destroyed with our cases,
[Ms. G.] provided emotional insights into
the secretive ‘supervised visitation
meetings’ by ‘man-hating feminists’: no
men were allowed at the meetings, the
agenda was strictly exclusionary, nobody
escaped supervision, and the protocols
were designed to maximize humiliation
'like you would imagine a Nazi meeting.'"

As Mailed

  • an abbreviated and redacted copy.

Extreme Parental Alienation Should Be Considered Child Abuse And Referred Criminally

In my previous open letter to the White House, dated November 19, 2023, I indicated my intentions to submit my third pro se and forma pauperis petition for a writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court. My petition was duly docketed on December 29, 2023, as No. 23-6398 with the following question:

  1. The “Sec. 8. Affirmatively Advancing Civil Rights … to prevent and address discrimination and advance equity for all” clause of the 2/16/2023 Presidential Executive Order results in the predictable “equity for the rich or equity for the poor mother?” dilemma as “equity for all” is impossible by Marxist design. Is the mandate to selectively “advance equity” (for a select few) Constitutional?

In my previous open letter, I mentioned my pro se Civil RICO Class Action Complaint, 1:23-cv-12692-PBS. Seemingly as retaliation, the substantiated complaint was again summarily dismissed with 16 direct misrepresentations of my specific facts. I took my second chance to formally ask [the federal question]:

  1. Does sovereign immunity apply to an “LGBTQ+” Massachusetts when using federal funds to subsidize the forceful separation and activist agenda-driven alienation of innocent American children from their loving American parents?